Hi, I’m David. I’m currently working on a degree in Digital Media Design. I love music, design, books, photography, film making and my family. People tell me I have a talent for clicking amazing pictures. Along with photos I’m also extremely passionate about creating short films and movies that stir people’s emotions. I’m looking for ways to further my skills in this field to impact people by producing movies that make a difference.
Tell us about yourself.
My name is Kim Wong, I worked as a digital journalist with Channel NewsAsia. I’m Malaysian.
How did you get into the field you are in now?
A friend of mine told me there was an opening and they were looking for someone who was interested in telling stories. I came from a business degree background so I had absolutely no knowledge of production or journalism. But I was interested in photography and videography having done some on the side in university. So i basically showed them my instagram photos and a travel video I did up, they thought i had an eye visually and thats how I got the job.
What motivates you to keep doing what you do?
That I was able to tell stories of ordinary Singaporeans and issues to a wider audience, and helping people be more aware of what is around us. It was accomplishing knowing how some stories were life changing and to be able to share that was motivating enough.
Could you imagine yourself doing any other job than the one you’re doing now?
Yes, the job scope was not just being a digital journalist but also at the same time we had to manage our social platforms and run a facebook page. Which means a business/marketing mindset in knowing what works and what does not too. So with that knowledge and background, I could go into social media marketing work and telling stories but from a business point of view.
If you could go back in time and do something differently what would it be?
I would have pushed myself more, in terms of getting out of my comfort zone, and honing better interview skills in getting out the best stories that I could. I could have challenged myself more as well in terms of the visual elements (shooting, camera angles etc) to tell a better story visually.
One piece of advice you would give someone starting out in the creative field?
Take in constructive criticism and learn from it. Don’t think that just because you have a great idea, it is a great idea and will work. No. You’re gonna have great ideas, and you’re gonna have stupid ideas that you feel the need to execute, but take a moment to look at things from a different perspective, talk to other people, and find out how those comments from others can help make your work better.
Kim can be found on Instagram @iamkimwong
As mentioned in a previous post, I plan to host my portfolio on a specially designed website. However, while a website is undoubtedly a great way to showcase your works, it simply doesn’t generate the same exposure as a social media account.
There are a wide variety of social networks available today, some are well known, while others are limited to a smaller niche. As far as photography goes, Instagram is undeniably the largest social network. With over 500 million active users, it’s behind only Facebook and Youtube (DeMers, 2017). Almost every photographer can be found on Instagram. It’s an almost necessary step to getting your content out there for people to discover.
But this post isn’t going to discuss the merits of the platform or weigh out its pros and cons – that is a topic for another time. Rather the focus here will be about my attempt at creating an appealing Instagram portfolio.
1. Choosing a subject
The first step was to choose a subject or area that will be main focus of my feed. A helpful way to do this is by looking through old photos and finding a common theme. In my case I ended up choosing people and travel. Now, this doesn’t mean that you’re limited to just these two areas, but they will take up the majority of the photos I post.
2. Choosing a style
This part is with a doubt the hardest problem I faced. Some photographers have a particular style (which I take a look at here), this gives their photos a consistent look and feel. I however, like to experiment with different styles and haven’t yet chosen one particular form that is consistent throughout all my photos. So to work around this problem I’ve designed my feed to incorporate different styles, but still maintain an aesthetically pleasing visual. This leads to the third point.
3. Designing the feed
On your feed, Instagram displays photos in 3s. So the approach I’ve taken is to upload 3 photos with the same style or feel in a row. This helps give the feed a pleasing look, but still lets me change the style every 3 or 6 or 9 posts.
As the screenshot shows, the first 12 images (with the exception of one) retain a black and white aesthetic. The last 3 images are where I’ve switched styles and gone for a very vibrant pink and blue vibe. The idea now is to add 3 or 6 more images that keep the pink and blue, and afterwards switch to another style.
As the photos pile on, keeping track of your Instagram feed can get quite complicated. And so, listed here are a few apps that I’ve used to help keep my feed in check.
Unum is a visual planner. This means you can upload your photos to the app and see what your Instagram feed will look like. This is helpful in keeping your aesthetic and style consistent and clean.
Command is a statistics and analysis app for Instagram. It gives you insights such as the best time to post, which filter is more popular and how you could generally improve your feed.
DeMers, J. (2017, March). Why Instagram is the top social platform for engagement (and how to use it). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaysondemers/2017/03/28/why-instagram-is-the-top-social-platform-for-engagement-and-how-to-use-it/#750784b236bd
Scott Kelby’s Digital Photography Book was one of the first books that I read as an aspiring photographer, and was definitely one of the best. Originally published in 2006, over the years it has been updated and revised as well have new books added to the series. As of the time of writing, there are 5 volumes available, each continuing where the previous book left off.
The idea behind the books is to explain concepts easily, without too much technical jargon. This excerpt from Scott sums it up best.
“If you and I were out on a shoot and you asked me, ‘Hey Scott, I want the light for this portrait to look really soft and flattering. How far back should I put this softbox?’ I wouldn’t give you a lecture about lighting ratios, or flash modifiers. In real life, I’d just turn to you and say, ‘Move it in as close to your subject as you possibly can, without it actually showing up in the shot.’ Well, that’s what this book is all about: you and I out shooting where I answer questions, give you advice, and share the secrets I’ve learned, just like I would with a friend–without all the technical explanations and techie photo speak.”
The story set as if you and Scott are two friends out on a shoot. The books are broken down into several chapters, each focusing on a certain type of photography, i.e. weddings, sports, landscapes, portraits, etc. Each page within the chapters presents a particular tip or technique, conveying it a simple, straight forward manner. It mostly avoids getting too technical, rather it simply focuses on what you need to do or what settings you need to change to achieve a certain kind of shot.
The books are filled with Scott’s light hearted humor and puns. This serves to lighten the mood of the book, helping to turn it into a fun read instead of a textbook. This is what makes Scott’s series stand out from the other photography books out there. It’s fun.
Some key things that I learned from the books –
- Holding the camera steady (Scott shared a technique about how to wrap the camera strap around your arm to achieve better stability.)
- Framing (Where to crop your portraits.)
- Perspective (Using a wide angle vs using a zoom to achieve very different effects)
Scott’s books are one of the best selling photography books in the world – and for good reason. If you’re a beginner just starting out in photography, these books will definitely help you learn what you need to know to capture better pictures. And if you’re a seasoned photographer, these books make a great read – and you might learn something new too.
At the end of each book Scott presents some of his photos and tells you exactly how he achieved that result. All of these and more, are compiled into volume 5 of The Digital Photography Book. So if you want to know more about how Scott shoots his subjects, and his exact thought process and workflow, book 5 is worth exploring.
The Digital Photography Books are available to purchase as physical copies or ebooks on Amazon.
Kelby, S. (2006). The digital photography book. volume 1: The step-by-step secrets for how to make your photos look like the pros’! Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
Kelby, S. (2008). The digital photography book: The step-by-step secrets for how to make your photos look like the pros! Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
Kelby, S. (2009). The digital photography book: The step-by-step secrets for how to make your photos look like the pros’! : Volume 3. Berkeley, Calif.: Peachpit Press.
Kelby, S. (2012). The digital photography book, part 4: The step-by-step secrets for how to make your photos look like the pros’! Berkeley, CA: Peachpit.
Presenting the fourth post in the Style Analysis series. The idea behind this series is to help form a better understanding of various photography and editing styles and methods.
Point to note – photography is subjective. This is not a post pointing out what I think are “good” and “bad” photos, rather I’m trying to take a fairly objective view and simply examine the techniques and style preferences of the photographers.
While Mark does shoot various types of photos, which can be found on his website, the focus for this post are his vibrant portraits. Portraiture was chosen simply because that’s what his Instagram account focuses on.
Color-wise, at first glance the photos do have some resemblance to Brandon Woelfel’s style, but upon closer inspection the differences become more obvious. Firstly, Mark’s photos are warmer and focus on the blues and oranges, while Brandon’s pictures are cooler, more desaturated and have a tint leaning more to the pink side. These are fairly simple variations, but provide the photographers with two vastly different styles. Another point to note is that Mark’s alters the blues to be more aqua, something that seems to be an increasingly more common trend on the Instagram.
The models in the photos are placed almost always in the center, putting the focus on them, and creating a pleasing symmetry to the image. There aren’t any extreme camera angles, with the camera placed more or less around eye level. The portraits are usually framed as a mid-shot or close-up, rarely showing the entire person, but instead focusing more on their face and expression.
Mark also uses props such as prisms, sparklers and fairy lights to add some flair to his photos. The props coupled with the bokeh caused by a large aperture lens, give the images an extra element to them, although they’re not used in every picture and Mark ‘s style doesn’t rely on them as much as, Brandon Woelfel.
As usual, this is not meant to be an detailed analysis, but simply my observations. Have you notice anything else in Mark’s style? Leave a comment if you did!
Singerman, M. (2017). [photograph]. Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/marksingerman
Bruhadeesh Siva is a filmmaker based in Mumbai, India. He currently creates content for an ad agency, and is part of the League of Indie Filmmakers.
Adobe’s Lightroom is without a doubt one of , if not the most popular RAW photo processing software out there. The vast majority of professionals use it for their photo editing needs, and even if you don’t use it, you’ll have at least heard of it.
However in the past few versions, Lightroom has been acting up. Performance is painfully slow, rendering previews take forever and it guzzles up RAM like a monster. And it’s not just me, a quick internet search will turn up hundreds of unhappy users over the past several years, in various forums and websites bemoaning Lightroom’s performance. And while Adobe has very recently acknowledged the issues in Lightroom (Fitzgerald, 2017), it will still take some time for them to roll out fixes to the problems, if at all. And to top it all off, a subscription to Lightroom isn’t cheap, and it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that shelling out cash for a program that is simply too slow to use at times is simply not worth it.
So what is a photographer to do now?
Well, one option is to give up photo editing, but that probably not an option for most people. The second choice is to switch to another program. While none of these software have the popularity of Lightroom, they still provide a fairly solid alternative for editing photos. Two notable ones include DxO Mark’s DxO Optics Pro and Phase One’s Capture One Pro. Of the two the one I prefer is Capture One, and as such that’s what’s going to be the focus of this post.
By far the biggest problem with switching from Lightroom is the interface change. Capture One’s interface isn’t bad per se, but it will take a while to get used to, especially if you’re used to a Lightroom workflow. The black and orange layout may not be to everyone’s taste and unfortunately there’s no way to change it, although you can customize other aspects such as windows and toolbars.
The performance though is a long way from Lightroom, it renders previews and applies changes much faster. It’s still not perfect though. It does occasionally lag and there are some stutters here and there. But it’s still a far cry from the almost unusable mess that is Lightroom. Adding to the benefits of Capture One you also get a minor image quality boost (Richardson, 2016). RAW images processed in Capture One simply have better color and sharpness. Another plus point to Capture One is tethering. For me, Lightroom has simply never worked when trying to tether my camera, so this feature is a nice added boon to have.
However the switching workflow hasn’t been easy, and I still have Lightroom installed – just in case. But for those of you wanting to give Capture One a try, I highly recommend watching this guide from Fstoppers to get aquatinted with the software (Woloszynowicz, 2014).
Fitzgerald, T. (2017, July). After years of complaints, Adobe acknowledges Lightroom performance issues. Retrieved from http://blog.thomasfitzgeraldphotography.com/blog/2017/7/after-years-of-complaints-adobe-acknowledges-lightroom-performance-issues
Richardson, M. (2016, June). Is it time to switch from Lightroom to Capture One Pro? Here’s why it might be. Retrieved from https://www.slrlounge.com/time-switch-lightroom-capture-one-pro-heres-might/
Woloszynowicz, M. (2014, July). The ultimate guide to getting started with Capture One Pro. Retrieved from https://fstoppers.com/originals/ultimate-guide-getting-started-capture-one-pro-27179
Recently I had the opportunity to briefly use a Sony A7s. The Sony A7s is a mirrorless camera. As the name implies, mirrorless cameras lack the mirror that typical DSLRs have. Due to this mirrorless cameras don’t have the optical viewfinder found in DSLRs. Apart from that one key difference though, for the most part they’re pretty similar. So why would you choose one over the other? Using the Sony A7s got me thinking – as a pretty avid DSLR user could I switch to using a mirrorless? Would I one day switch to a mirrorless?
The most obvious change when going from a full frame DSLR to a mirrorless is the size. The Sony is tiny. This is great because, there are way too many times I left my camera at home simply due to its sheer size. The Sony’s weight, or lack thereof, make it easier on the arms during long trips and photoshoots. However the downside is ergonomics. Now this may vary with different brands and models, but I found the A7s difficult to hold comfortably. It’s edges are sharp and there simply wasn’t much space to get a grip on. This problem was made worse when the lens mounted on it was a gargantuan 70-200mm f/2.8. I preferred my DSLR’s larger, softer grip and better balance with larger lenses. On a similar note, I didn’t like the buttons and the scroll wheel either. This could be seen as a minor quibble, but when you spend north of $2000 on a camera, little things matter. They matter all the more if you plan to make a living by spending hours a day using the camera.
Apart from the size, the next most obvious change is the viewfinder. Because they lack a mirror, mirrorless cameras have to rely on an electronic viewfinder. At first this takes some getting used to – the whole image just seems off. As electronic viewfinders go, it’s definitely not a bad one, but if I had the choice, I’d pick an optical one every time. At least until technology progresses and electronic viewfinders improve. Regarding image quality – there are absolutely no issues. Pictures are every bit as good as a DSLR. In some cases this is because both cameras use the same sensor!
So would I switch to a mirrorless or recommend a mirrorless to someone?
I wouldn’t switch to one, largely in part because switching between camera ecosystems is mind numbingly expensive, and I’m already invested into Nikon’s DSLRs. However for someone who hasn’t yet chosen a ecosystem, I might just recommend getting a mirrorless camera. While they may not replace DSLRs yet, mirrorless cameras are proving to be a pretty popular and viable alternative.
Cover image from Sony (2017)